Network School and Privilege: Who Can Actually Afford to Join and Who Is Excluded
An honest examination of who Network School is accessible to, the privilege required to join, fellowship programs, and the inclusivity debate.
The Barriers to Entry
Joining NS requires several forms of privilege that are unevenly distributed globally.
Joining NS requires several forms of privilege that are unevenly distributed globally. Financial: $1,500/month minimum plus flights and incidentals requires either savings, remote income, or external support. Geographic: a passport that allows visa-free entry to Malaysia excludes citizens of many developing countries. Professional: the ability to work remotely or take extended leave is available to a fraction of global workers. Cultural: comfort with English as the working language, familiarity with tech culture, and willingness to live in communal housing filter the applicant pool further. Each barrier independently excludes millions of people. Together, they narrow the pool to a specific demographic.
Who Actually Joins
The typical NS member profile is a 25 to 35 year old tech professional or aspiring entrepreneur from North America, Europe, India, Nigeria, or East Asia, with remote income or savings, a strong passport, and English fluency. This profile represents a tiny fraction of the global population. The gender skew (65 to 70 percent male) reflects the demographics of crypto and tech communities. The community includes members from 70+ nationalities, which sounds diverse until you note that most members from developing countries come from the educated, English-speaking, economically privileged segments of their societies. Diversity of nationality does not automatically mean diversity of class or experience.
Fellowship and Access Programs
NS addresses accessibility through the Fellowship program, which provides full scholarships covering membership, room, and board. The Fellowship targets high-potential applicants who could not otherwise afford NS. Some fellowships include additional funding of up to $100,000 for builders. While meaningful for individual recipients, the fellowship program operates at limited scale relative to the total community size. NS has also explored reduced pricing for members from lower-income countries and early-stage entrepreneurs without funding. These programs demonstrate awareness of the access problem but do not fully solve it.
Engaging with the Privilege Question
The most productive response to the privilege critique is honest acknowledgment rather than defensive dismissal. NS is, by design, a premium community serving a specific demographic. This is not inherently wrong — universities, conferences, and professional communities all have barriers to entry. The question is whether NS creates outsized positive impact that extends beyond its members. If NS graduates build companies, create jobs, develop open-source tools, and generate knowledge that benefits broader populations, the privilege of membership may be justified by its downstream effects. This is an empirical question that will take years to answer.
$1,500/month minimum — equivalent to average monthly income in Malaysia
Source: World Bank
Fellowship program provides full scholarships for selected applicants
Source: NS
“The goal is not to pretend that privilege does not exist, but to use whatever privilege you have to create opportunities for others. Communities should be judged by what they produce, not just who they include.”
Frequently Asked Questions
Can someone from a developing country afford NS?
At $1,500/month, NS is affordable for tech professionals earning competitive remote salaries regardless of their country of origin. However, for most people in developing countries, this cost is prohibitive. Fellowship programs exist to bridge this gap, but they are limited in scale. NS is most accessible to people from any country who have transitioned to remote tech or freelance work.
Is NS doing enough to be inclusive?
This depends on your expectations. NS has fellowship programs, has explored tiered pricing, and actively recruits from underrepresented groups. Critics argue these efforts are insufficient given the structural barriers. Supporters argue that NS is a private community, not a public institution, and that the fellowship program demonstrates good faith. The honest answer is that NS is more inclusive than many comparable communities but less inclusive than its stated values suggest.
Does the privilege of NS members invalidate the community?
No — all communities have barriers to entry, and privilege does not invalidate the value created within them. The relevant question is not whether NS members are privileged (they are) but whether the community produces positive externalities for broader society. Universities are also privileged institutions that justify their existence through knowledge creation and social mobility. NS should be evaluated on similar terms.
Ready to join Network School?
Get 1 week free when you apply through our referral link. Monthly cohorts start on the 1st.
Apply Now
